Bibliometrik literasi informasi pustakawan: Analisis tren penelitian di Pusat Perpustakaan dan Literasi Pertanian Bogor
Analysis of Research Trends at the Bogor Agricultural Library and Literacy Center
Abstract
Information literacy is an essential skill that librarians must possess to optimally support users' information needs. This study aims to analyze the trends and main themes in research on librarians' information literacy, with a focus on the Center for Library and Agricultural Literacy in Bogor. The method used is bibliometric analysis of relevant scientific publications to trace the frequency of keyword occurrences, the distribution of publications over time, and the contributions of institutions to the development of this topic. The results show that the terms "information literacy," "librarian," and "human" are the most frequently appearing keywords in these studies. These findings highlight the importance of strengthening the capacity of librarians, not only as collection managers but also as active facilitators of information literacy in the development of knowledge.
References
Aria, M., Misuraca, M., & Spano, M. (2020). Mapping the Evolution of Social Research and Data Science on 30 Years of Social Indicators Research. Social Indicators Research, 149(3), 803–831. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-020-02281-3
Batubara, H. S., Giatman, M., Simatupang, W., & Watrianthos, R. (2021). Pemetaan Bibliometrik Terhadap Riset pada Sekolah Menengah Kejuruan Menggunakan VOSviewer. EDUKATIF : JURNAL ILMU PENDIDIKAN, 4(1), 233–239. https://doi.org/10.31004/edukatif.v4i1.1818
Firdaus, N., Supriatna, S., & Supriatna, J. (2022). Ecosystem services research trends in Indonesia: A bibliometric analysis. Biodiversitas Journal of Biological Diversity, 23(2). https://doi.org/10.13057/biodiv/d230255
Gaviria-Marin, M., Merigo, J. M., & Popa, S. (2018). Twenty years of the Journal of Knowledge Management: A bibliometric analysis. Journal of Knowledge Management, 22(8), 1655–1687. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-10-2017-0497
Martínez-López, F., Merigó, J., Valenzuela-Fernández, L., & Nicolás, C. (2018). Lima puluh tahunJurnal Pemasaran Eropa: Analisis bibliometrik.Jurnal Pemasaran. Eropa,52(1/2), 439–468. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJM-11-2017-0853
Pauna, V. H., Picone, H., Le Guyader, G., Buonocore, E., & Franzese, P. P. (2018). The scientific research on ecosystem services: A bibliometric analysis. Ecological Questions, 29(3), 53–62.
Purkarthofer, E., Humer, A., & Mäntysalo, R. (2021). Regional planning: An arena of interests, institutions and relations. Regional Studies, 55(5), 773–777. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2021.1875128
Roig-Tierno, N., Gonzalez-Cruz, T. F., & Llopis-Martinez, J. (2017). An overview of qualitative comparative analysis: A bibliometric analysis. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 2(1), 15–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2016.12.002
Ronal Watrianthos, Ambiyar, Fahmi Rizal, Nizwardi Jalinus, & Waskito. (2022). Research on Vocational Education in Indonesia: A Bibliometric Analysis. JTEV (Jurnal Teknik Elektro Dan Vokasional),8(2), 187-192.
School of Foreign Language, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou, China. (2022). Research Hotspot and Evolution Trend of REITs Since the New Century—From the Perspective of Bibliometrics. Journal of Innovation and Social Science Research, 9(4). https://doi.org/10.53469/jissr.2022.09(04).17
Singh, V. K., Singh, P., Karmakar, M., Leta, J., & Mayr, P. (2021). The journal coverage of Web of Science, Scopus and Dimensions: A comparative analysis. Scientometrics, 126(6), 5113–5142. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-021-03948-5
Thelwall, M. (2018). Dimensions: A competitor to Scopus and the Web of Science? Journal of Informetrics, 12(2), 430–435. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2018.03.006
Van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84(2), 523–538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3
Xie, H., Zhang, Y., Zeng, X., & He, Y. (2020). Sustainable land use and management research: A scientometric review. Landscape Ecology, 35, 2381–2411.




